{"id":211,"thumbnail":"https://jilailawyer.com//rails/active_storage/blobs/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBa1lEIiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJibG9iX2lkIn19--53ba01c5f3355b3f85312dfe6d4b79d8c34e4286/66.jpg","title_zh":"新修订！最高法发布《最高人民法院关于适用 〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》","title_en":"New revision! The Supreme People's Court issued the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China","content_zh":"\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e月4日上午，最高人民法院召开新闻发布会，发布《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》，最高人民法院副院长李少平，最高人民法院审判委员会副部级专职委员、刑一庭庭长沈亮，最高人民法院研究室副主任周加海出席新闻发布会，最高人民法院新闻局副局长王斌主持新闻发布会。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》（法释〔2021〕1号，以下简称《新刑诉法解释》）的有关情况如下：\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e01\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》的制定背景\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e年10月26日，十三届全国人大常委会第六次会议通过《关于修改〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的决定》（以下简称《刑事诉讼法修改决定》），自2018年10月26日起施行。这是继1996年和2012年刑事诉讼法修改后，对中国特色刑事诉讼制度的又一次十分重要的改革与完善。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《刑事诉讼法修改决定》共26条，对\u003cb\u003e刑事诉讼法18个条文作了修改\u003c/b\u003e，同时\u003cb\u003e新增了18个条文\u003c/b\u003e，主要涉及\u003cb\u003e完善监察与刑事诉讼的衔接机制\u003c/b\u003e、\u003cb\u003e建立刑事缺席审判程序\u003c/b\u003e、\u003cb\u003e完善认罪认罚从宽制度和增加速裁程序\u003c/b\u003e、\u003cb\u003e为与其他法律相协调所作的修改\u003c/b\u003e等四方面内容。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e修改后刑事诉讼法从\u003cb\u003e290条\u003c/b\u003e增加到\u003cb\u003e308条\u003c/b\u003e。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e本次刑事诉讼法修改，内容丰富，对刑事审判工作的影响重大。为确保法律准确、有效实施，早在刑事诉讼法修改过程中，最高人民法院即密切跟踪立法进程，同步开展修改《最高人民法院关于适用\u0026lt;中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法\u0026gt;的解释》（法释〔2012〕21号，以下简称《2012年解释》）的前期准备工作，向院内相关部门征求司法解释修改意见，并就若干重要专题委托十七家高院、八家中院和三家基层法院开展前期调研，确保司法解释起草坚持问题导向，汇集司法实践智慧。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《刑事诉讼法修改决定》通过后，经过反复调研论证，起草了解释稿，多次征求中央有关部门、地方法院的意见，并邀请十余位刑诉法专家进行论证。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e特别是，为准确反映立法精神，解释起草过程中，曾多次征求立法机关意见。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e年12月7日，最高人民法院院长、首席大法官周强主持召开最高人民法院审判委员会第1820次会议，审议并通过《新刑诉法解释》，现决定正式对外发布，自2021年3月1日起施行。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》共计27章、655条，历经最高人民法院刑事审判专业委员会八次审议和最高人民法院审判委员会全体会议三次审议，是最高人民法院有史以来条文数量最多的司法解释，也是内容最为丰富、最为重要的司法解释之一。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e解释坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，认真贯彻习近平法治思想，全面总结我国刑事审判实践的新情况、新问题，对刑事审判程序的有关问题作了系统规定。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》的公布施行，对于人民法院严格依照法定程序正确履行审判职责，规范办案活动，保障诉讼权利，确保修改后刑事诉讼法的准确、有效实施，实现惩罚犯罪与保障人权的有机统一，具有重要意义。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan lang=\"EN-US\" style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e02\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》的主要内容\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e与《2012年解释》相比，《新刑诉法解释》增加\u0026ldquo;认罪认罚案件的审理\u0026rdquo;\u0026ldquo;速裁程序\u0026rdquo;\u0026ldquo;缺席审判程序\u0026rdquo;三章，增加107条，作了实质修改的条文超过200条。重点如下：\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e（一）坚持以人民为中心，强化人权司法保障\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e以人民为中心是中国特色社会主义法治的本质要求。习近平总书记指出，推进全面依法治国，根本目的是依法保障人民利益。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》坚持贯彻以人民为中心的理念，将强化诉权保障作为贯穿始终的主线，通过具体制度设计，依法保障被告人的诉讼权利，充分保障辩护律师依法履行辩护职责，切实维护被害人合法权益，把尊重和保障人权落到实处。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e一是进一步强化辩护权保障。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e辩护权是诉讼权利的核心。《新刑诉法解释》根据刑事诉讼法的规定和司法实践的具体情况，规定被告人没有委托辩护人，法律援助机构没有指派律师为其提供辩护的，人民法院应当告知被告人有权约见值班律师，推进刑事辩护、法律帮助全覆盖；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e针对指定辩护与委托辩护并存的情形，明确规定应当赋予被告人选择权，尊重被告人的选择；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e对作为证据向人民法院移送的讯问录音录像，准许辩护律师查阅，切实保障查阅权；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e明确经人民法院准许，律师可以带一名助理参加庭审，从事相关辅助工作，为律师履职提供充分保障，促进律师队伍\u0026ldquo;传、帮、带\u0026rdquo;。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e二是进一步强化质证权保障。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》重申同案同审的一般原则，要求分案审理应当以有利于保障庭审质量和效率为前提，强调分案审理不得影响当事人质证权等诉讼权利的行使。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e特别是，审理过程中，必要时可以传唤分案审理的共同犯罪或者关联犯罪案件的被告人等到庭对质。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e对于分案起诉的共同犯罪或者关联犯罪案件，人民法院经审查认为，合并审理更有利于查明案件事实、保障诉讼权利、准确定罪量刑的，可以并案审理。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e三是进一步强化被告单位的诉权保障。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e被告单位诉讼代表人的确定，是单位犯罪审理程序的基础。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e针对司法实践中诉讼代表人确定难的现实问题，《新刑诉法解释》适度扩大了诉讼代表人的确定范围：以单位内部人员作为第一选择，包括被告单位的法定代表人、实际控制人或者主要负责人，以及被告单位的其他负责人或者职工；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e在被告单位内部没有合适人员担任诉讼代表人的情况下，可以由被告单位委托律师等单位以外的人员作为诉讼代表人，维护被告单位的合法权益。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e四是进一步强化未成年人的权益保障。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》贯彻新修订的《未成年人保护法》《预防未成年人犯罪法》的理念精神和制度要求，规定审理未成年人遭受性侵害或者暴力伤害案件，在询问未成年被害人、证人时，应当采取同步录音录像等措施，尽量一次完成；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e要加强与有关部门配合，对遭受性侵害或者暴力伤害的未成年被害人及其家庭实施必要的心理干预、经济救助、法律援助、转学安置等保护措施，加强对未成年人的特殊保护。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e同时，为切实执行刑事诉讼法的有关规定，明确讯问未成年人，其法定代理人或者合适成年人不在场的，对其供述应当依法予以排除。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e（二）坚持以审判为中心，有效维护司法公正\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革，是党中央作出的重大决策部署。《新刑诉法解释》根据以审判为中心的要求，强化证据裁判原则，细化审理程序，确保庭审在查明事实、认定证据、保护诉权、公正裁判中发挥决定性作用，实现案件裁判的实体公正，提高司法公信力。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e一是强化证据裁判要求。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e针对实践中有的案件证据材料移送不全的问题，《新刑诉法解释》规定，人民法院应当审查证明被告人有罪、无罪、罪重、罪轻的证据材料是否全部随案移送；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e未随案移送的，应当通知在指定时间内移送；经通知未移送的，人民法院应当根据在案证据对案件事实作出认定。这意味着，如果因为未移送证据，导致相关事实存疑的，应当按照有利于被告人的原则作出认定。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e二是强化庭审中心地位。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》厘清庭前会议与庭审程序的关系，明确对于庭前会议中听取控辩双方意见的程序性事项，人民法院可以在庭前会议后依法作出处理，并在庭审中宣布决定、说明理由；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e完善法庭调查程序，依法通知证人、鉴定人、有专门知识的人出庭，对于审判期间证人、鉴定人、被害人因出庭作证，本人或者其近亲属的人身安全面临危险的，人民法院应当采取保护措施；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e强化裁判文书说理，要求裁判文书应当写明裁判依据，阐释裁判理由，反映控辩双方的意见并说明采纳或者不予采纳的理由。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e三是明确死缓二审案件一律开庭审理。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e为进一步贯彻落实两审终审制、完善死刑案件审判程序、保证死刑案件质量，《新刑诉法解释》规定，被告人被判处死刑的上诉案件，包括死刑缓期二年执行的案件，第二审人民法院一律应当开庭审理；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e被判处死刑立即执行、死刑缓期二年执行的被告人没有上诉，同案的其他被告人上诉的案件，第二审人民法院也应当开庭审理。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e（三）规范涉案财物处理，加强产权司法保护\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e随着经济社会发展，越来越多的刑事案件涉及财物处理问题，涉案财物的数量越来越多、价值越来越大，利益关系也越来越复杂。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e为强化产权司法保护，《新刑诉法解释》充实完善对涉案财物审查、处理、执行的相关规定，要求对定罪量刑和涉案财物处理并重。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e一是进一步强化对涉案财物的庭前审查。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》规定在立案审查阶段，要审查涉案财物是否随案移送并列明权属情况，以及是否有证明相关财物系违法所得或者依法应当追缴的其他涉案财物的证据材料；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e在庭前会议中，可以就涉案财物的权属情况和处理建议听取意见。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e二是进一步强化对涉案财物的当庭调查。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》规定在法庭审理过程中，应当对查封、扣押、冻结财物及其孳息的权属、来源等情况，是否属于违法所得或者依法应当追缴的其他涉案财物进行调查，由公诉人说明情况、出示证据、提出处理建议，并听取被告人、辩护人等诉讼参与人的意见；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e案外人对涉案财物提出权属异议的，人民法院应当听取案外人的意见，必要时，可以通知案外人出庭；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e在法庭辩论时，要就涉案财物处理的相关问题进行辩论。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e三是进一步强化对涉案财物的处理执行。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》针对个别案件中存在漏判随案移送的涉案财物的问题，规定在二审期间发现的，可以发回原审人民法院重新审判，由原审人民法院依法作出处理；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e判决生效后发现的，由原审人民法院对涉案财物依法另行作出处理。根据涉案财物集中保管改革，完善了涉案财物执行的相关规定。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e（四）做好监察法与刑事诉讼法的衔接，保持反腐败高压态势\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e根据《监察法》和修改后刑事诉讼法的规定，《新刑诉法解释》完善审判程序与监察调查的衔接机制，细化完善违法所得没收程序和缺席审判程序的规定，为新时代反腐败斗争和国际追逃追赃工作提供有力司法保障。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e一是明确监察调查证据的使用规则。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e根据《监察法》的规定，《新刑诉法解释》明确，监察机关依法收集的证据材料，在刑事诉讼中可以作为证据使用；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e对于监察机关收集的证据的审查判断，适用刑事审判关于证据的要求和标准。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e二是健全审判程序与监察调查的衔接机制。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e《新刑诉法解释》增加对监察调查相关事项进行审查的要求，规定对提起公诉的案件，应当审查起诉书是否写明被告人是否受过或者正在接受处分、被采取留置措施的情况，以及监察调查的各种法律手续和诉讼文书是否齐全；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e明确监察讯问录音录像的审查规则，规定在法庭决定对证据收集的合法性进行调查时，可以有针对性地播放监察调查讯问的录音录像；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e明确监察调查人员出庭的有关问题，规定法庭决定对证据收集的合法性进行调查的，可以由公诉人通过宣读讯问笔录、提请法庭通知有关调查人员出庭说明情况等方式，证明证据收集的合法性。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e三是完善违法所得没收程序。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e根据《监察法》的规定，结合司法实践经验，《新刑诉法解释》规定对于贪污贿赂、失职渎职、恐怖活动、黑社会性质组织、电信诈骗等重大犯罪案件，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿，在通缉一年后不能到案，依照刑法规定应当追缴其违法所得及其他涉案财产的，可以适用违法所得没收程序；\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e对于犯罪嫌疑人、被告人死亡，依照刑法规定应当追缴其违法所得及其他涉案财产的，也可以适用违法所得没收程序。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e四是细化缺席审判程序。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e适应新时代国际追逃追赃工作的需要，根据修改后刑事诉讼法的规定，《新刑诉法解释》设专章对缺席审判程序作了细化，规定对于贪污贿赂犯罪案件，以及需要及时进行审判，经最高人民检察院核准的严重危害国家安全犯罪、恐怖活动犯罪案件，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在境外的，可以适用缺席审判程序依法作出判决，并对违法所得及其他涉案财产作出处理，决不让腐败分子和其他犯罪分子逍遥法外、逃避惩罚。\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e附：最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》的解释\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"center\" style=\"text-align:center; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cimg alt=\"\" src=\"/ckeditor_assets/pictures/305/content_66.1.png\" style=\"width: 200px; height: 200px;\" /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"center\" style=\"text-align:center; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e扫一扫，阅读全文\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp style=\"margin:0cm; text-align:justify\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n","content_en":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eOn the morning of February 4, the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court held a press conference to release the Interpretation of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People\u0026#39;s Republic of China. Member and President of the First Criminal Division Shen Liang, and Zhou Jiahai, Deputy Director of the Research Office of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court, attended the press conference, and Wang Bin, Deputy Director of the Information Bureau of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court, presided over the press conference.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe relevant information of the \u0026quot;Interpretation of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People\u0026#39;s Republic of China\u0026quot; (Fa Shi [2021] No. 1, hereinafter referred to as the \u0026quot;Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law\u0026quot;) is as follows:\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e01 The background of the formulation of the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eOn October 26, 2018, the Sixth Session of the Standing Committee of the Thirteenth National People\u0026#39;s Congress passed the \u0026quot;Decision on Amending the Criminal Procedure Law of the People\u0026#39;s Republic of China\u0026quot; (hereinafter referred to as the \u0026quot;Decision on Amending the Criminal Procedure Law\u0026quot;). Effective from the 26th. This is another very important reform and improvement of the criminal procedure system with Chinese characteristics following the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 1996 and 2012.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe Decision to Amend the Criminal Procedure Law consists of 26 articles, which amends 18 articles of the Criminal Procedure Law and adds 18 articles, which mainly involve improving the connection mechanism between supervision and criminal proceedings, establishing criminal trial procedures in absentia, and improving confession and punishment. The leniency system, the increase of expedited judgment procedures, and the amendments made to harmonize with other laws are four aspects.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe revised Criminal Procedure Law has been increased from 290 to 308.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThis revision of the Criminal Procedure Law is rich in content and has a significant impact on criminal trial work. In order to ensure the accurate and effective implementation of the law, the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court closely followed the legislative process as early as in the revision process of the Criminal Procedure Law, and simultaneously carried out the revision of the Interpretation of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People\u0026#39;s Republic of China (Legal Interpretation [ 2012] No. 21, hereinafter referred to as the \u0026quot;2012 Interpretation\u0026quot;), solicited opinions on the revision of the judicial interpretation from the relevant departments in the court, and entrusted seventeen high courts, eight intermediate courts and three grassroots courts to conduct preliminary investigations on several important topics , to ensure that the drafting of judicial interpretations adheres to the problem orientation and brings together the wisdom of judicial practice.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eAfter the adoption of the \u0026quot;Decision on Amending the Criminal Procedure Law\u0026quot;, after repeated investigations and demonstrations, an explanatory draft was drafted, the opinions of relevant central departments and local courts were solicited many times, and more than ten experts in criminal procedure law were invited to conduct demonstrations.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn particular, in order to accurately reflect the spirit of the legislation, the opinions of the legislature were solicited many times during the drafting of the interpretation.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eOn December 7, 2020, Zhou Qiang, President and Chief Justice of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court, presided over the 1820th meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court to review and approve the \u0026quot;Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law\u0026quot;. Effective from the 1st of the month.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law has a total of 27 chapters and 655 articles. It has undergone eight deliberations by the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court Criminal Judgment Professional Committee and three deliberations at the Plenary Sessions of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court Judicial Committee. It is the judicial interpretation with the largest number of articles in the history of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court. It is one of the most abundant and important judicial interpretations.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe interpretation adheres to the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, conscientiously implements Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law, comprehensively summarizes new situations and new problems in my country\u0026#39;s criminal trial practice, and makes systematic provisions on issues related to criminal trial procedures.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe promulgation and implementation of the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law provides for the people\u0026#39;s courts to correctly perform their trial duties in strict accordance with legal procedures, to regulate case handling activities, to protect litigation rights, to ensure the accurate and effective implementation of the revised Criminal Procedure Law, and to realize the punishment of crimes and the protection of human rights. Organic unity is of great significance.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e02The main content of the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eCompared with the \u0026quot;2012 Interpretation\u0026quot;, the \u0026quot;New Criminal Procedure Law Interpretation\u0026quot; adds three chapters, \u0026quot;trial of plead guilty and accepted punishment cases\u0026quot;, \u0026quot;expedited judgment procedure\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;trial in absentia procedure\u0026quot;, adding 107 articles, and making substantial amendments to more than 200 articles . The key points are as follows:\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e(1) Adhere to the people-centered approach and strengthen judicial protection of human rights\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eTaking the people as the center is the essential requirement of the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics. General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that the fundamental purpose of promoting comprehensive law-based governance of the country is to protect the interests of the people in accordance with the law.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law adheres to the people-centered concept, takes strengthening the protection of litigation rights as the main line throughout, and through specific system design, protects the defendant\u0026#39;s litigation rights in accordance with the law, fully guarantees that defense lawyers perform their defense duties in accordance with the law, and earnestly safeguard The legitimate rights and interests of victims, and respect and protection of human rights are implemented.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe first is to further strengthen the protection of the right to defense. The right to defense is the core of litigation rights. According to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the specific circumstances of judicial practice, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that if the defendant has not appointed a defender and the legal aid institution has not assigned a lawyer to defend him, the people\u0026#39;s court shall inform the defendant that he has the right to see the duty lawyer , to promote full coverage of criminal defense and legal assistance;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn the case of the coexistence of designated defense and entrusted defense, it is clearly stipulated that the defendant should be given the right to choose and the defendant\u0026#39;s choice should be respected;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eAllow defense lawyers to inspect the audio and video recordings of interrogations that are transferred to the people\u0026#39;s court as evidence, and effectively protect the right of inspection;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eWith the approval of the people\u0026#39;s court, lawyers can bring an assistant to participate in court trials to engage in related auxiliary work, provide sufficient guarantee for lawyers to perform their duties, and promote the \u0026quot;passing, helping, and leading\u0026quot; of the lawyer team.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe second is to further strengthen the protection of the right to cross-examination. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law reiterates the general principle of the same case and the same trial, requires that the divisional trial should be based on the premise of ensuring the quality and efficiency of the court trial, and emphasizes that the divisional trial shall not affect the exercise of the parties\u0026#39; right to cross-examine and other procedural rights.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn particular, during the trial process, when necessary, the defendants of the joint crime or related crime cases being tried separately may be summoned to appear in court for confrontation.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eFor joint crime or related crime cases prosecuted in separate cases, if the people\u0026#39;s court, after review, believes that joint trial is more conducive to ascertaining the facts of the case, safeguarding litigation rights, and accurately convicting and sentencing, the case may be tried together.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe third is to further strengthen the protection of the defendant\u0026#39;s right to appeal. The determination of the defendant unit\u0026#39;s litigation representative is the basis of the unit crime trial procedure.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn response to the practical problem of difficulty in determining litigation representatives in judicial practice, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law appropriately expands the scope of the determination of litigation representatives: internal personnel of the unit are the first choice, including the legal representative and actual controller of the defendant unit. or the main responsible person, and other responsible persons or employees of the defendant unit;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn the case where there is no suitable person within the defendant unit to serve as the litigation representative, the defendant unit may entrust a lawyer or other personnel other than the unit as the litigation representative to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the defendant unit.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe fourth is to further strengthen the protection of the rights and interests of minors. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law implements the concept, spirit and institutional requirements of the newly revised Law on the Protection of Minors and the Law on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency. Victims and witnesses should take measures such as synchronizing audio and video recordings, and try to complete them at one time;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIt is necessary to strengthen cooperation with relevant departments, and implement necessary psychological intervention, financial assistance, legal aid, transfer and resettlement and other protective measures for minor victims of sexual assault or violence and their families, and strengthen special protection for minors.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eAt the same time, in order to effectively implement the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and clearly interrogate minors, if their legal representatives or suitable adults are not present, their confessions should be excluded in accordance with the law.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e(2) Adhere to adjudication as the center and effectively safeguard judicial fairness\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003ePromoting the reform of the criminal procedure system centered on trial is a major decision and deployment made by the Party Central Committee. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law, in accordance with the requirements of centering on trial, strengthens the principle of evidence adjudication, refines trial procedures, and ensures that court trials play a decisive role in ascertaining facts, determining evidence, protecting rights of action, and impartial adjudication. fairness and improve judicial credibility.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe first is to strengthen the requirements of evidence-based adjudication. In response to the problem of incomplete transfer of evidence materials in some cases in practice, the \u0026quot;Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law\u0026quot; stipulates that the people\u0026#39;s court shall examine whether all the evidence materials proving the defendant\u0026#39;s guilt, innocence, serious crime and minor crime are transferred with the case;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIf the case is not transferred with the case, it shall be notified to transfer within the specified time; if the notification is not transferred, the people\u0026#39;s court shall determine the facts of the case based on the evidence in the case. This means that if the relevant facts are in doubt because the evidence has not been transferred, the determination should be made in accordance with the principle in favor of the defendant.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe second is to strengthen the central status of court trials. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law clarifies the relationship between the pretrial conference and the court trial procedure, and clarifies that the people\u0026#39;s court can handle the procedural matters in the pretrial conference hearing the opinions of the prosecution and the defense according to law after the pretrial conference, and announce it during the trial decide and explain the reasons;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eImprove court investigation procedures, notify witnesses, evaluators, and persons with specialized knowledge to appear in court in accordance with the law, and the people\u0026#39;s courts shall take protective measures when witnesses, evaluators, or victims testify in court during the trial, and the personal safety of themselves or their close relatives is at risk;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eStrengthen the reasoning of the judgment documents, requiring the judgment documents to specify the basis of the judgment, explain the reasons for the judgment, reflect the opinions of the prosecution and the defense, and explain the reasons for adopting or not adopting.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe third is to clarify that all second-instance cases with a suspended death sentence will be heard in court. In order to further implement the two-instance final-trial system, improve the trial procedures for death penalty cases, and ensure the quality of death penalty cases, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that appeal cases where the defendant has been sentenced to death, including cases where the execution of the death penalty is suspended for two years, shall be subject to the second-instance trial. All people\u0026#39;s courts shall hold court sessions;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eDefendants sentenced to death sentence with immediate execution or a two-year suspension of execution did not appeal, and the people\u0026#39;s court of second instance should also hold court hearings for cases appealed by other defendants in the same case.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e(3) Regulate the handling of property involved in cases and strengthen judicial protection of property rights\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eWith the development of economy and society, more and more criminal cases involve the disposal of property, the quantity and value of the property involved are increasing, and the interest relationship is becoming more and more complicated.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn order to strengthen the judicial protection of property rights, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law has enriched and improved the relevant provisions on the review, handling and enforcement of the property involved in the case, requiring equal emphasis on conviction and sentencing and the handling of the property involved in the case.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe first is to further strengthen the pre-trial review of the property involved in the case. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that in the stage of filing a case review, it is necessary to review whether the property involved in the case was transferred with the case and list the ownership, and whether there are evidence materials proving that the relevant property is illegal income or other property involved in the case that should be recovered according to law;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eAt the pretrial conference, opinions may be heard on the ownership of the property involved and suggestions for handling.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe second is to further strengthen the in-court investigation of the property involved in the case. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that in the process of court hearing, an investigation shall be conducted on the ownership and source of the seized, detained, frozen property and its fruits, whether it is illegal income or other property involved in the case that should be recovered according to law, and the The public prosecutor explains the situation, presents evidence, puts forward handling suggestions, and listens to the opinions of the defendants, defenders and other litigation participants;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIf a person outside the case raises an objection to the ownership of the property involved in the case, the people\u0026#39;s court shall hear the opinion of the person outside the case, and when necessary, may notify the person outside the case to appear in court;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eWhen debating in court, it is necessary to debate issues related to the disposal of the property involved in the case.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe third is to further strengthen the handling of the property involved in the case. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law addresses the issue of the property involved in individual cases that was not convicted and transferred along with the case, and stipulates that if it is discovered during the second instance, it may be returned to the original people\u0026#39;s court for a new trial, and the original people\u0026#39;s court will handle it according to law;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIf it is discovered after the judgment takes effect, the people\u0026#39;s court of the original instance shall deal with the property involved in the case in accordance with the law. According to the reform of centralized custody of the property involved in the case, the relevant provisions on the execution of the property involved in the case have been improved.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003e(4) Do a good job in the connection between the Supervision Law and the Criminal Procedure Law, and maintain a high-pressure anti-corruption situation\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eIn accordance with the provisions of the Supervision Law and the revised Criminal Procedure Law, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law improves the connection mechanism between trial procedures and supervisory investigations, refines and improves the confiscation procedures for illegal gains and the procedures for trial in absentia, and provides a new era of anti-corruption. The struggle and the international pursuit of fugitives and asset recovery provide strong judicial guarantees.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe first is to clarify the rules for the use of evidence in supervision and investigation. According to the provisions of the Supervision Law, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law clarifies that the evidence materials collected by the supervisory organs in accordance with the law can be used as evidence in criminal proceedings;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eFor the review and judgment of the evidence collected by the supervisory organs, the requirements and standards for evidence in criminal trials shall apply.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe second is to improve the connection mechanism between judicial procedures and supervision and investigation. The Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law increases the requirements for reviewing matters related to supervision and investigation, and stipulates that in cases of public prosecution, it is necessary to review whether the indictment states whether the defendant has received or is being punished, and has been subject to detention measures, as well as the situation of supervision Whether the various legal formalities and litigation documents investigated are complete;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eClarify the review rules for audio and video recordings of supervision and interrogation, stipulating that when the court decides to investigate the legality of evidence collection, the audio and video recordings of supervision, investigation and interrogation can be played in a targeted manner;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eClarify the issues related to the appearance of supervisory investigators in court, and stipulate that if the court decides to investigate the legality of evidence collection, the public prosecutor can prove the legality of evidence collection by reading out the transcript of the interrogation, requesting the court to notify the relevant investigators to appear in court to explain the situation, etc.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe third is to improve the confiscation procedures for illegal gains. According to the provisions of the \u0026quot;Supervision Law\u0026quot; and combined with judicial practice experience, the \u0026quot;Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law\u0026quot; stipulates that for major criminal cases such as corruption and bribery, dereliction of duty, terrorist activities, underworld organizations, and telecommunications fraud, criminal suspects and defendants should escape and hide. If one year after being wanted, he cannot appear in the case, and his illegal gains and other property involved in the case should be recovered in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law, the confiscation procedure of illegal gains may be applied;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eFor the death of a criminal suspect or defendant, if the illegal gains and other property involved in the case should be recovered in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law, the procedure for confiscation of illegal gains may also be applied.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eThe fourth is to refine the trial procedure in absentia. To meet the needs of the international pursuit of fugitives and assets in the new era, according to the provisions of the revised Criminal Procedure Law, the Interpretation of the New Criminal Procedure Law has set up a special chapter to refine the procedure of trial in absentia, and stipulates that for cases of corruption and bribery crimes, and the need for timely Trial. In cases of serious crimes against national security or terrorist activities approved by the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Procuratorate, where the criminal suspect or defendant is abroad, the trial procedure in absentia may be applied to make a judgment in accordance with the law, and the illegal gains and other property involved in the case will be dealt with. Do not allow corrupt and other criminals to go unpunished and escape punishment.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eAttachment: Interpretation of the Supreme People\u0026#39;s Court on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People\u0026#39;s Republic of China\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"left\" style=\"text-align:left; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"center\" style=\"text-align:center; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cimg alt=\"\" src=\"/ckeditor_assets/pictures/305/content_66.1.png\" style=\"width: 200px; height: 200px;\" /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp align=\"center\" style=\"text-align:center; margin:0cm\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:10.5pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:等线\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12.0pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:宋体\"\u003eScan to read the full text\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n","_type":"继来法视界","position":0,"created_at":"2021-03-18T09:53:26.538+08:00","updated_at":"2021-02-04T14:49:00.000+08:00","pv":19633,"abstract_zh":"2月4日上午，最高人民法院召开新闻发布会，发布《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》，最高人民法院副院长李少平，最高人民法院审判委员会副部级专职委员、刑一庭庭长沈亮，最高人民法院研究室副主任周加海出席新闻发布会，最高人民法院新闻局副局长王斌主持新闻发布会。","abstract_en":"On the morning of February 4, the Supreme People's Court held a press conference to release the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. Member and President of the First Criminal Division Shen Liang, and Zhou Jiahai, Deputy Director of the Research Office of the Supreme People's Court, attended the press conference, and Wang Bin, Deputy Director of the Information Bureau of the Supreme People's Court, presided over the press conference.","link":""}