{"id":165,"thumbnail":"https://jilailawyer.com//rails/active_storage/blobs/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBdTBCIiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJibG9iX2lkIn19--f198eba31af1a6203ecefcda347055b8d4e49bc1/%E6%9D%83%E5%A8%81%E5%8F%91%E5%B8%83.jpg","title_zh":"中纪委明确：公职人员过失犯罪，哪些情形可不予开除","title_en":"The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection made it clear that public officials who committed crimes with negligence may not be dismissed under what circumstances","content_zh":"\u003ch2 align=\"right\" style=\"margin: 0pt 0pt 10.5pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: right;\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e来源：中央纪委国家监委网站\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》（以下简称《政务处分法》）第十四条规定，因过失犯罪被判处管制、拘役或者三年以下有期徒刑的，一般应当予以开除；案件情况特殊，予以撤职更为适当的，可以不予开除，但是应当报请上一级机关批准。该条因涉及相关公职人员的\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e饭碗\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e备受关注。如何理解\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e案件情况特殊\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e以及\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e报请上一级机关批准\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e具体程序，是全面准确理解和适用该条的前提。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 20px;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e0\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 20px;\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e全面准确理解和适用该条的前提\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e《政务处分法》施行前，公职人员被判处三年以下有期徒刑等刑罚后，在不同的历史时期，处理的标准不尽相同，不同的对象可能面临不同的处理结果。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e一、对行政机关公务员和参公管理人员的处理。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e1957\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年《国务院关于国家行政机关工作人员的奖惩暂行规定》规定，国家行政机关工作人员被判处徒刑宣告缓刑的，其职务也自然撤销，在缓刑期间，仍然可以留在机关继续工作的，应该根据具体情况，分配适当的工作。根据上述规定，行政机关工作人员被判处缓刑的，可以保留公职。\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e1988\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年《国家行政机关工作人员贪污贿赂行政处分暂行规定》也有类似规定。\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e2007\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年《行政机关公务员处分条例》第十七条规定，行政机关公务员依法被判处刑罚的，给予开除处分，意味着只要被判处刑罚，不论是有期徒刑缓刑、拘役、管制、罚金等较轻刑罚，也不论是故意犯罪还是过失犯罪，均给予开除处分。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e二、对事业单位工作人员的处理。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e2012\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年《事业单位工作人员处分暂行规定》第二十二条规定，事业单位工作人员被依法判处刑罚的，给予降低岗位等级或者撤职以上处分。其中，被依法判处有期徒刑以上刑罚的，给予开除处分。行政机关任命的事业单位工作人员，被依法判处刑罚的，给予开除处分。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e三、对法院、检察院工作人员的处理。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e《人民法院工作人员处分条例》《检察人员纪律处分条例》均规定，其工作人员被判处刑罚的，均给予开除处分。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e四、对国有企业人员的处理。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e1982\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年《企业职工奖惩条例》及相关解答意见规定，对企业职工，包括其中由国家行政机关任命的工作人员，被判处管制以及宣告缓刑的，一般可不予开除。该条例于\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e2008\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年被废止后，对行政机关任命的国有企业领导干部被判处刑罚的，参照《行政机关公务员处分条例》规定，给予开除处分；对非行政机关任命的国有企业人员被判处刑罚的，依据《劳动合同法》第三十九条及企业内部惩戒规定处理，并非一律解除合同。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e从给予被判处刑罚的公职人员纪律处理的历史沿革看，呈现三个明显特点：一是从分类处理到统一标准。此前，对公务员的纪律处理严于非公务员，对事业单位和国有企业中行政机关任命的公职人员的纪律处理，严于非行政机关任命的人员。《政务处分法》施行后，从表述上统一了标准和尺度。二是保留公职程序日益严格，《政务处分法》施行后，明确需报请上一级机关批准。三是保留公职的条件日趋务实合理，从\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e有条件保留公职\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e到\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e一律开除公职\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e，再到\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e原则上开除、特殊情况可保留公职\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e，体现了对政务处分更加审慎的立法态度，确保处理结果充分体现宽严相济的要求。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e此外，党纪处分条例第三十二条规定，\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e因过失犯罪被判处三年以下（含三年）有期徒刑或者被判处管制、拘役的，一般应当开除党籍。对于个别可以不开除党籍的，应当对照处分党员批准权限的规定，报请再上一级党组织批准\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e。《政务处分法》确立保留公职情形，实现与保留党籍情形的衔接，有利于党纪政务处分的平衡\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 11pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: 宋体;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 20px;\"\u003e02\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e过失犯罪后保留公职建议重点把握的问题\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e一、必须是过失犯罪。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e相对故意犯罪，过失犯罪的主观恶性较小，且不少过失犯罪系缺乏专业知识和工作经验造成，具有一定的偶然性，特别是对有受害人的过失犯罪来说，在犯罪人员认罪悔罪、赔偿损失后，也易取得受害人的谅解，有效减轻社会危害性。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e二、必须被判处管制、拘役或者三年以下有期徒刑。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e与被判处三年以上有期徒刑等刑罚相比，此类刑罚属传统观念中的\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e轻刑\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e，其社会危害性相对较小，有条件保留公职可以释放较好的执法效果。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e三、要从严把握\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e案件情况特殊\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Times New Roman\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e情形。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e一般情况下，\u003c/font\u003e \u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e以开除为原则，不开除为例外。只有具备\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e案件情况特殊，予以撤职更为适当的\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e条件，才可以不予开除。建议以下情形可考虑保留公职：一是政治素养较好，业绩突出或者曾作出重大贡献，保留公职有利于地区、行业事业发展；二是专业技术水平高，在本地区、本行业或者本领域内具有较高知名度的专家型人才，成果丰硕，保留公职有利于继续作出贡献、服务群众的；三是具有家庭困难、身体不好、临近退休等特殊情况，开除公职可能严重影响生活的；四是涉及国防、外交、民族、宗教等极个别特殊案件，需要保留公职；五是保留公职可以充分体现执纪执法综合效果的其他情形。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e此外，保留公职的情形不宜\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e一刀切\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e，要综合考量，既要防止\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e好人主义\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e思想作祟而滥用，也要避免因担心被问责而不用。要做好区域和系统的平衡，对本地区或系统易发多发、影响恶劣的过失犯罪，从警示角度考虑，保留公职更应从严控制。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan class=\"15\" style=\"font-family: \u0026quot;Times New Roman\u0026quot;;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: bold;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e四、必须严格落实报批程序要求。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e关于《政务处分法》第十四条中的\u003c/font\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e上一级机关\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e，宜区别把握：\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e（\u003c/font\u003e1\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e）对监察机关作出的政务处分，可参考\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e2005\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e年\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e7\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e月中央纪委法规室对《关于适用〈中国共产党纪律处分条例〉第三十条的处分批准程序的请示》的答复精神，上一级党组织包括上一级纪检监察机关。笔者建议，对拟保留公职的案件，可由相关监察机关报同级党委批准后，以同级党委名义书面报上一级监委审批。请示应当围绕\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e案情特殊\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e阐述\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e保留公职更为恰当\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e的具体理由，预判处理效果。所附材料建议参考党纪报批案件要求，附司法机关生效判决、裁定、违纪违法事实见面材料、审查报告、审理报告、忏悔反思，以及能够证明案情特殊可保留公职的现实表现、专业技术等级、荣誉表彰等材料。待上一级监委同意后，由呈报监委作出政务撤职处分。案情特殊、复杂的，必要时上一级监委可将案件报同级党委批准或备案。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=\"p\" style=\"margin: 5pt 0pt; padding: 0pt; text-align: left;\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp style=\"margin: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size: 10.5pt;\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e（\u003c/font\u003e2\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e）对公职人员任免机关、单位拟作出撤职处分的，\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e上一级机关\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"Calibri\"\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/font\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e包括任免机关、所在单位的上一级机关。此外，要把握撤职处分作出的时间，对可能判处三年以下有期徒刑等刑罚，符合保留公职条件的受处分人，在司法机关作出生效判决、裁定前，也可暂不作出政务处分决定，待判决、裁定作出后再视情处理。\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n","content_en":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003eSource: Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and State Supervision Commission website\u003cbr /\u003e\r\nArticle 14 of the Law of the People\u0026#39;s Republic of China on Governmental Sanctions for Public Officials (hereinafter referred to as the \u0026quot;Governmental Sanctions Law\u0026quot;) stipulates that those sentenced to public surveillance, criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years for negligent crimes shall generally be expelled; If the dismissal is more appropriate, it may not be dismissed, but it should be reported to the higher-level authority for approval. This article has attracted much attention because it involves the \u0026quot;rice bowl\u0026quot; of relevant public officials. How to understand the \u0026quot;special circumstances of the case\u0026quot; and the specific procedures of \u0026quot;reporting to the higher-level authority for approval\u0026quot; is the premise for a comprehensive and accurate understanding and application of this article.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e01. Comprehensive and accurate understanding and application of the premise of this article\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003eBefore the implementation of the \u0026quot;Governmental Sanctions Law\u0026quot;, after public officials were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, the treatment standards were different in different historical periods, and different objects may face different treatment results.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e1. Handling of civil servants and managers of administrative organs. In 1957, the \u0026quot;Interim Provisions of the State Council on Rewards and Punishments for Staff of State Administrative Organs\u0026quot; stipulated that if a staff member of a state administrative organ is sentenced to imprisonment and declared a suspended sentence, his position will be automatically revoked. Assign appropriate work to specific circumstances. According to the above provisions, administrative organs staff who are sentenced to suspended sentences may retain their public positions. The 1988 \u0026quot;Interim Provisions on Administrative Punishments for Embezzlement and Bribery of State Administrative Organs Staff\u0026quot; also contained similar provisions. Article 17 of the 2007 Regulations on the Punishment of Civil Servants of Administrative Organs stipulates that if a civil servant of an administrative organ is sentenced to a criminal penalty according to law, he shall be given a penalty of dismissal, which means that as long as he is sentenced to a penalty, whether it is a relatively light sentence such as fixed-term imprisonment, suspended sentence, criminal detention, public surveillance, or a fine. , and whether it is an intentional crime or a negligent crime, the penalty of dismissal shall be given.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e2. Handling of staff of institutions. Article 22 of the 2012 \u0026quot;Interim Provisions on Punishment of Staff in Institutions\u0026quot; stipulates that if a staff member of a public institution is sentenced to criminal punishment according to law, he shall be given a sanction of lowering the level of his post or being dismissed from his post. Among them, those who have been sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment or more in accordance with the law shall be given the sanction of expulsion. If a staff member of a public institution appointed by an administrative organ is sentenced to criminal punishment in accordance with the law, he shall be given a punishment of dismissal.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e3. Handling of court and procuratorate staff. The Regulations on Disciplinary Actions for Staff of the People\u0026#39;s Courts and the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions for Procuratorial Personnel stipulate that all staff members who are sentenced to criminal punishment shall be given the punishment of dismissal.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e4. Treatment of personnel of state-owned enterprises. The 1982 \u0026quot;Regulations on Rewards and Punishments for Enterprise Employees\u0026quot; and related answers stipulate that employees of enterprises, including those appointed by state administrative organs, who are sentenced to public surveillance and declared suspended, generally may not be dismissed. After the regulations were repealed in 2008, if the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises appointed by administrative organs are sentenced to criminal punishment, they shall be expelled in accordance with the provisions of the Regulations on the Punishment of Civil Servants of Administrative Organs; , according to Article 39 of the \u0026quot;Labor Contract Law\u0026quot; and the internal punishment regulations of the enterprise, not all contracts are terminated.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003eJudging from the historical evolution of the disciplinary treatment of public officials sentenced to punishment, there are three obvious characteristics: First, from classified treatment to unified standards. Previously, the disciplinary treatment of civil servants was stricter than that of non-civil servants, and the disciplinary treatment of public officials appointed by administrative agencies in public institutions and state-owned enterprises was stricter than those appointed by non-administrative agencies. After the implementation of the \u0026quot;Government Sanctions Law\u0026quot;, the standards and scales were unified in terms of expression. Second, the procedures for retaining public office are becoming more and more strict. After the implementation of the \u0026quot;Government Sanctions Law\u0026quot;, it is clearly necessary to report to the higher-level authority for approval. The third is that the conditions for retaining public office are increasingly pragmatic and reasonable, ranging from \u0026quot;conditional retention of public office\u0026quot; to \u0026quot;dismissal from public office\u0026quot; to \u0026quot;dismissal in principle, and retention of public office under special circumstances\u0026quot;, which reflects a more prudent legislative attitude towards governmental sanctions and ensures that The processing result fully reflects the requirement of combining leniency and strictness.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003eIn addition, Article 32 of the Regulations on Party Disciplinary Punishment stipulates that \u0026quot;Those who are sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years (including three years) or sentenced to public surveillance or criminal detention for negligent crimes shall generally be expelled from the Party. Comparing with the regulations on the authority for sanctioning party members, report to the party organization at the next higher level for approval.\u0026rdquo; The \u0026quot;Public Affairs Sanctions Law\u0026quot; establishes the situation of retaining public office and realizes the connection with the situation of retaining party membership, which is conducive to the balance of party discipline and government sanctions.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e02. Problems to be grasped in the suggestion of retaining public office after negligent crime\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e1. It must be a crime of negligence. Compared with intentional crimes, negligent crimes are less subjectively malignant, and many negligent crimes are caused by lack of professional knowledge and work experience, and have certain contingency. After the loss, it is also easy to obtain the understanding of the victim, effectively reducing the social harm.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e2. Must be sentenced to public surveillance, criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years. Compared with punishments such as those sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of more than three years, this kind of punishment is a \u0026quot;light sentence\u0026quot; in the traditional concept, and its social harm is relatively small. Conditional retention of public office can release better law enforcement effects.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e3. Strictly grasp the \u0026quot;special circumstances of the case\u0026quot;. In general, dismissal is the principle and no dismissal is the exception. Only if the conditions of \u0026quot;special circumstances of the case make it more appropriate to be dismissed\u0026quot; can the dismissal not be granted. It is suggested to consider retaining public office under the following circumstances: First, the political literacy is good, the performance is outstanding or the major contribution has been made, and the retention of public office is conducive to the development of the region and industry; Expert talents with high reputation, fruitful achievements, and retaining public positions are conducive to continuing to make contributions and serve the masses; third, those who have special circumstances such as family difficulties, poor health, and near retirement, and dismissal from public positions may seriously affect their lives; fourth, Very few special cases involving national defense, foreign affairs, ethnicity, religion, etc., need to retain public office; fifth, other situations where retaining public office can fully reflect the comprehensive effect of discipline and law enforcement.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003eIn addition, the situation of retaining public office should not be \u0026quot;one size fits all\u0026quot;, and must be considered comprehensively, not only to prevent the \u0026quot;good man\u0026quot; ideology from being misused and abused, but also to avoid using it for fear of being held accountable. It is necessary to do a good job in the balance between the region and the system. For negligent crimes that are prone to frequent occurrence and bad influence in the region or system, from the perspective of warning, the retention of public positions should be strictly controlled.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003eFour, must strictly implement the requirements of the approval procedures. Regarding the \u0026quot;superior authority\u0026quot; in Article 14 of the \u0026quot;Government Sanctions Law\u0026quot;, it is advisable to distinguish between:\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e(1) For the governmental sanctions made by the supervisory organs, refer to the spirit of the reply of the Law Office of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in July 2005 to the \u0026quot;Request for Instructions on the Approval Procedure for Sanctions Approved by Article 30 of the Regulations of the Communist Party of China on Disciplinary Sanctions\u0026quot;. Party organizations include the higher-level discipline inspection and supervision organs. The author suggests that, for cases where public office is to be retained, the relevant supervisory organ may report it to the party committee at the same level for approval, and then submit it in writing to the supervisory committee at the next higher level for approval in the name of the party committee at the same level. The request for instructions should focus on the \u0026quot;special circumstances of the case\u0026quot; to explain the specific reasons for \u0026quot;it is more appropriate to retain public office\u0026quot;, and to prejudge the effect of the handling. The attached materials are suggested to refer to the requirements of the party\u0026#39;s disciplinary report for approval of the case, and attach the effective judgments, rulings of the judicial organs, meeting materials on the facts of violations of disciplines and laws, review reports, trial reports, repentance and reflection, as well as actual performance, professional and technical level, honors that can prove that the case is special and can retain public office. Commendation, etc. After the approval of the supervisory committee at the higher level, the supervisory committee shall report to the supervisory committee for administrative dismissal. If the case is special and complicated, the supervisory committee at the next higher level may report the case to the party committee at the same level for approval or filing when necessary.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"p\" style=\"margin:5pt 0pt; padding:0pt; text-align:left\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-size:12pt\"\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-family:Calibri\"\u003e\u003cfont face=\"宋体\"\u003e(2) For the appointment and dismissal agency or unit that intends to impose a sanction of dismissal, the \u0026quot;superior agency\u0026quot; includes the appointment and dismissal agency and the higher-level agency of the unit to which they belong. In addition, it is necessary to grasp the time when the sanction of removal from office is made. For those who may be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of less than three years and meet the conditions for retaining public office, they may not make a decision on governmental sanctions until the judicial organ makes an effective judgment or ruling. Judgments and rulings will be dealt with according to the circumstances.\u003c/font\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n","_type":"继来法视界","position":4,"created_at":"2020-11-04T14:06:53.317+08:00","updated_at":"2020-09-19T13:58:00.000+08:00","pv":19510,"abstract_zh":"中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》（以下简称《政务处分法》）第十四条规定，因过失犯罪被判处管制、拘役或者三年以下有期徒刑的，一般应当予以开除；案件情况特殊，予以撤职更为适当的，可以不予开除，但是应当报请上一级机关批准。该条因涉及相关公职人员的“饭碗”备受关注。如何理解“案件情况特殊”以及“报请上一级机关批准”具体程序，是全面准确理解和适用该条的前提。","abstract_en":"Article 14 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Governmental Sanctions for Public Officials (hereinafter referred to as the \"Governmental Sanctions Law\") stipulates that those sentenced to public surveillance, criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years for negligent crimes shall generally be dismissed; If the dismissal is more appropriate, it may not be dismissed, but it should be reported to the higher-level authority for approval. This article has attracted much attention because it involves the \"rice bowl\" of relevant public officials. How to understand the \"special circumstances of the case\" and the specific procedures of \"reporting to the higher-level authority for approval\" is the premise for a comprehensive and accurate understanding and application of this article.","link":""}